Evidence Credibility · Method Overview

Learning evidence credibility and locally repairing citations at answer time.

Start from this prompt

Learning evidence credibility and locally repairing citations at answer time.

Create a 16:9 wide horizontal paper method overview diagram showing how the system learns evidence credibility and locally repairs citations when answering.

Theme: "EVIDENCE CREDIBILITY LEARNING / ANSWERING WITH EVIDENCE CHECKS".

The first stage contains RETRIEVAL TRACE SUMMARY and CROSS-TRACE COMPARISON, showing SPLIT, RETRIEVE, RERANK, CITE, ANSWER as well as SOURCE, TABLE, CAPTION, FOOTNOTE, and summarizing TRUST SIGNALS and MIS-CITATION PATTERNS; the shared area contains EVIDENCE MANAGER, EVIDENCE LIBRARY, MIS-CITATION MANAGER; the second stage must be split into two paths — "Credible → Final Answer" and "Unreliable → Re-Recall → Citation Rewrite → Evidence Check" — with only unreliable fragments entering the re-retrieval loop.

White background, thin lines, high information density; use three light-colored dashed boxes to organize the stages, thick arrows for stage progression, thin arrows for internal flow, and dashed lines for cross-module references.

Use English labels throughout; the credible branch must not be misconnected to Re-Recall, and the loop exit must return to the final answer.

Add trust legend

Adds a TRUST SIGNALS legend in the lower right, explaining each signal's color and icon.

Try Kimi Design

Create a 16:9 wide horizontal paper method overview diagram showing how the system learns evidence credibility and locally repairs citations when answering.

Theme: "EVIDENCE CREDIBILITY LEARNING / ANSWERING WITH EVIDENCE CHECKS".

The first stage contains RETRIEVAL TRACE SUMMARY and CROSS-TRACE COMPARISON, showing SPLIT, RETRIEVE, RERANK, CITE, ANSWER as well as SOURCE, TABLE, CAPTION, FOOTNOTE, and summarizing TRUST SIGNALS and MIS-CITATION PATTERNS; the shared area contains EVIDENCE MANAGER, EVIDENCE LIBRARY, MIS-CITATION MANAGER; the second stage must be split into two paths — "Credible → Final Answer" and "Unreliable → Re-Recall → Citation Rewrite → Evidence Check" — with only unreliable fragments entering the re-retrieval loop.

White background, thin lines, high information density; use three light-colored dashed boxes to organize the stages, thick arrows for stage progression, thin arrows for internal flow, and dashed lines for cross-module references.

Use English labels throughout; the credible branch must not be misconnected to Re-Recall, and the loop exit must return to the final answer.

Switch to deep blue

Recolors the main accents to deep blue and charcoal while keeping the dashed stage boxes.

Try Kimi Design

Create a 16:9 wide horizontal paper method overview diagram showing how the system learns evidence credibility and locally repairs citations when answering.

Theme: "EVIDENCE CREDIBILITY LEARNING / ANSWERING WITH EVIDENCE CHECKS".

The first stage contains RETRIEVAL TRACE SUMMARY and CROSS-TRACE COMPARISON, showing SPLIT, RETRIEVE, RERANK, CITE, ANSWER as well as SOURCE, TABLE, CAPTION, FOOTNOTE, and summarizing TRUST SIGNALS and MIS-CITATION PATTERNS; the shared area contains EVIDENCE MANAGER, EVIDENCE LIBRARY, MIS-CITATION MANAGER; the second stage must be split into two paths — "Credible → Final Answer" and "Unreliable → Re-Recall → Citation Rewrite → Evidence Check" — with only unreliable fragments entering the re-retrieval loop.

White background, thin lines, high information density; use three light-colored dashed boxes to organize the stages, thick arrows for stage progression, thin arrows for internal flow, and dashed lines for cross-module references.

Use English labels throughout; the credible branch must not be misconnected to Re-Recall, and the loop exit must return to the final answer.

Add mis-citation example

Attaches one typical mis-citation example next to the pattern summary, with cause and repair path.

Try Kimi Design

Create a 16:9 wide horizontal paper method overview diagram showing how the system learns evidence credibility and locally repairs citations when answering.

Theme: "EVIDENCE CREDIBILITY LEARNING / ANSWERING WITH EVIDENCE CHECKS".

The first stage contains RETRIEVAL TRACE SUMMARY and CROSS-TRACE COMPARISON, showing SPLIT, RETRIEVE, RERANK, CITE, ANSWER as well as SOURCE, TABLE, CAPTION, FOOTNOTE, and summarizing TRUST SIGNALS and MIS-CITATION PATTERNS; the shared area contains EVIDENCE MANAGER, EVIDENCE LIBRARY, MIS-CITATION MANAGER; the second stage must be split into two paths — "Credible → Final Answer" and "Unreliable → Re-Recall → Citation Rewrite → Evidence Check" — with only unreliable fragments entering the re-retrieval loop.

White background, thin lines, high information density; use three light-colored dashed boxes to organize the stages, thick arrows for stage progression, thin arrows for internal flow, and dashed lines for cross-module references.

Use English labels throughout; the credible branch must not be misconnected to Re-Recall, and the loop exit must return to the final answer.